# Plan Mode Activate Claude's extended thinking mode with multi-level planning depth from 'think' to 'ultrathink' for comprehensive strategy creation before implementation --- ## Metadata **Title:** Plan Mode **Category:** commands **Author:** JSONbored **Added:** October 2025 **Tags:** plan-mode, extended-thinking, strategy, architecture, deep-reasoning, ultrathink **URL:** https://claudepro.directory/commands/plan-mode ## Overview Activate Claude's extended thinking mode with multi-level planning depth from 'think' to 'ultrathink' for comprehensive strategy creation before implementation ## Content The /plan-mode command activates Claude's extended thinking capabilities with progressive depth levels to create comprehensive strategies before jumping into implementation. FEATURES • Multi-Level Thinking: Progressive depth from 'think' 8/10 Ready to proceed with Week 1-2? (y/n) ### Maximum Depth (ultrathink) **Command:** /plan-mode "Design scalable microservices architecture" --ultrathink --architecture **Claude's Comprehensive Analysis:** [Extended Thinking Mode: ultrathink] [This may take minutes for thorough analysis] Phase 1: Requirements Analysis Current System: • Monolithic architecture (250K LOC) • PostgreSQL database (2TB) • Peak load: 10K req/s • Team: 20 developers • Deployment: Weekly releases Pain Points: • Deployment requires full system downtime • Database bottleneck at peak load • Slow feature velocity (conflicting changes) • Scaling inefficient (must scale entire monolith) Goals: • Zero-downtime deployments • Independent service scaling • Faster feature delivery • Improved fault isolation Phase 2: Service Decomposition Strategy Boundary Identification: 1) User Service • Domain: Identity, authentication • Data: 5M users, 100MB • Load: 2K req/s • Team: 3 developers 2) Product Service • Domain: Catalog, inventory • Data: 1M products, 50GB • Load: 5K req/s • Team: 5 developers 3) Order Service • Domain: Transactions, fulfillment • Data: 10M orders, 500GB • Load: 1K req/s • Team: 4 developers 4) Payment Service • Domain: Billing, subscriptions • Data: 8M transactions, 200GB • Load: req/s • Team: 3 developers 5) Notification Service • Domain: Email, SMS, push • Data: Events only • Load: 3K req/s • Team: 2 developers Phase 3: Technology Stack Services: user-service: runtime: Node.js (Fast user queries) database: PostgreSQL (ACID for users) cache: Redis (Session storage) product-service: runtime: Node.js (Heavy read workload) database: PostgreSQL (Primary) cache: Redis (Product catalog) search: Elasticsearch (Full-text search) order-service: runtime: Node.js (Transaction handling) database: PostgreSQL (Strong consistency) message-queue: RabbitMQ (Order processing) payment-service: runtime: Node.js (PCI compliance) database: PostgreSQL (Financial data) encryption: At-rest and in-transit notification-service: runtime: Node.js (I/O heavy) queue: RabbitMQ (Async delivery) providers: SendGrid, Twilio, FCM Phase 4: Communication Patterns Synchronous (REST/GraphQL): • User → Product (Browse catalog) • Order → Payment (Process transaction) Asynchronous (Event-Driven): • Order Created → Notification (Send confirmation) • Payment Success → Order (Update status) • Product Updated → Search (Index update) Phase 5: Data Management Database Per Service: • User Service: users DB • Product Service: products DB • Order Service: orders DB • Payment Service: payments DB Shared Data Access Patterns: 1) API calls (preferred) 2) Event sourcing (eventual consistency) 3) CQRS (read replicas) Phase 6: Migration Strategy (12 months) Quarter 1: Foundation • Week 1-4: Setup Kubernetes cluster • Week 5-8: Implement API gateway • Week : Extract User Service (lowest risk) Quarter 2: Core Services • Week : Extract Product Service • Week : Extract Order Service Quarter 3: Financial Systems • Week : Extract Payment Service (highest risk) • Week : Audit and compliance Quarter 4: Supporting Services • Week : Extract Notification Service • Week : Decommission monolith • Week : Optimization and monitoring Phase 7: Infrastructure Kubernetes: nodes: 20 (auto-scaling ) namespaces: dev, staging, production Service Mesh (Istio): - Traffic management - Circuit breaking - Mutual TLS - Observability Monitoring: - Prometheus (metrics) - Grafana (dashboards) - Jaeger (distributed tracing) - ELK Stack (logging) CI/CD: - GitHub Actions - ArgoCD (GitOps) - Canary deployments Phase 8: Risk Assessment High Risk: 1) Data consistency during migration Mitigation: Dual-write pattern, verify before cutover 2) Service discovery failures Mitigation: Health checks, circuit breakers 3) Distributed transaction complexity Mitigation: Saga pattern, compensating transactions Medium Risk: 1) Team skill gaps Mitigation: Training program, pair programming 2) Infrastructure costs increase Mitigation: Right-sizing, spot instances Low Risk: 1) Monitoring gaps Mitigation: Observability-first design Phase 9: Success Metrics Technical: • Deployment frequency: 1/week → 10/day • Lead time: 2 weeks → 2 days • MTTR: 4 hours → 30 minutes • Service uptime: % → % Business: • Feature velocity: +% • Cost per transaction: -30% • Customer satisfaction: +15% Phase 10: Go/No-Go Decision Recommendation: PROCEED Reasoning: • Clear business case (velocity + uptime) • Manageable risk with mitigation plan • Team buy-in confirmed • Budget approved Next Steps: 1) Form migration team (5 engineers) 2) Setup Kubernetes cluster (Week 1) 3) Begin User Service extraction (Week 5) Estimated Total Cost: $450K (infrastructure + developer time) ROI Timeline: 18 months Approve architecture plan? (y/n) ## Thinking Levels Comparison | Level | Time | Depth | Use Case | |-------|------|-------|----------| | think | 30s | Surface analysis | Quick decisions, simple tasks | | think hard | 60-90s | Multiple alternatives | Feature planning, moderate complexity | | think harder | 2-3min | Deep analysis, risks | Refactoring, architecture changes | | ultrathink | 5-10min | Comprehensive strategy | System design, migrations | ## When to Use Each Level ### --think (Quick Planning) - Adding a new API endpoint - Fixing a known bug - Writing a simple feature - Code refactoring (small scope) ### --think-hard (Moderate Planning) - Designing a new feature - Database schema changes - Integration with third-party service - Performance optimization ### --think-harder (Deep Planning) - Large refactoring projects - Migration strategies - Architecture improvements - Complex debugging ### --ultrathink (Maximum Planning) - Microservices architecture - System-wide migrations - Technology stack changes - Multi-month projects ## Best Practices 1. **Plan Before Code**: Use `/plan-mode` before implementing complex features 2. **Interrupt When Needed**: Press ESC if Claude's plan goes off track 3. **Approve Before Proceeding**: Use `--approve-first` for critical changes 4. **Match Depth to Complexity**: Don't use ultrathink for simple tasks 5. **Review Alternatives**: Extended thinking evaluates multiple approaches 6. **Document Plans**: Plans serve as architecture documentation 7. **Iterate on Feedback**: Refine plan based on team input ## Integration with Other Commands ### Plan → TDD Workflow /plan-mode "Add payment processing" --think-hard --no-implement REVIEW PLAN /tdd-workflow "Implement payment processing per plan" --unit ### Plan → Subagents /plan-mode "Refactor auth system" --think-harder --no-implement REVIEW PLAN /subagent-create --architect --code-reviewer --test-engineer IMPLEMENT WITH SPECIALIST SUBAGENTS ### Plan → Checkpoints /plan-mode "Database migration" --ultrathink CREATE CHECKPOINT BEFORE PROCEEDING IMPLEMENT MIGRATION REWIND IF ISSUES ARISE --- Source: Claude Pro Directory Website: https://claudepro.directory URL: https://claudepro.directory/commands/plan-mode This content is optimized for Large Language Models (LLMs). For full formatting and interactive features, visit the website.